Birmberg v. Isquith
126 Misc. 584, 214 N.Y.S. 104, 1926 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 605
This text of 126 Misc. 584 (Birmberg v. Isquith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Birmberg v. Isquith, 126 Misc. 584, 214 N.Y.S. 104, 1926 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 605 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).
Opinion
The identical motion having previously been denied by a justice of the New York City Municipal Court without leave to renew it could not be brought on again. (Goldenberg v. Adler, 123 N. Y. Supp. 387.)
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and judgment reinstated.
All concur; present, Bijur, Delehanty and Wagner, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Goldenberg v. Adler
123 N.Y.S. 387 (New York Supreme Court, 1910)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
126 Misc. 584, 214 N.Y.S. 104, 1926 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/birmberg-v-isquith-nyappterm-1926.