Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/Birmberg v. Isquith

Birmberg v. Isquith

126 Misc. 584, 214 N.Y.S. 104, 1926 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 605
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided February 8, 1926·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The identical motion having previously been denied by a justice of the New York City Municipal Court without leave to renew it could not be brought on again. (Goldenberg v. Adler, 123 N. Y. Supp. 387.)

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and judgment reinstated.

All concur; present, Bijur, Delehanty and Wagner, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Birmberg v. Isquith, 126 Misc. 584, 214 N.Y.S. 104, 1926 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 605 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

126 Misc. 584 (Birmberg v. Isquith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goldenberg v. Adler
123 N.Y.S. 387 (New York Supreme Court, 1910)