Birks v. Russell
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
Birks sued Bussell before a justice of the peace, declaring that Bussell had conveyed to him a tract of land in St. Louis county with covenants of warranty. He assigned a breach of this covenant, and asked for damages amounting ■to $92.89 and interest.
[336] The case was dismissed by the justice, as being beyond his jurisdiction. The Circuit Court, on motion of defendant when the case was before it on appeal, made the same-disposition of it. Plaintiff sued out a writ of error to this-court.
We make the same ruling. The statute expressly declares that justices of the peace shall not have cognizance “ of any action where the title to any land or tenements, shall come in question.” 2 Wag. Stat. 810.
This action is brought for an alleged breach of a covenant for title to land. The judgment of the Circuit Court-is affirmed,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1 Mo. App. 335 (Birks v. Russell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.