Biri v. Biri
This text of 156 So. 25 (Biri v. Biri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff was granted a 'judgment of separation from bed and board from her husband on May 3, 1932. After the lapse of one year, she brought the'present suit for divorce, alleging that no reconciliation had. taken place. The defendant put the case at issue by filing answer. At the trial plaintiff proved that no reconciliation had taken place, and was .granted a divorce as prayed for. .Defendant appealed. Counsel for defendant has filed no brief, nor did he appear in court to argue the case.orally. The testimony taken at the trial is in the ..record, and shows that no reconciliation had taken place between the parties since the judgment of separation was signed on May 3, 1932. The judgment appealed from is correct, and is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
156 So. 25, 180 La. 1, 1934 La. LEXIS 1480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/biri-v-biri-la-1934.