Birge v. Wanhop
23 Tex. 441
This text of 23 Tex. 441 (Birge v. Wanhop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Birge v. Wanhop, 23 Tex. 441 (Tex. 1859).
Opinion
It is well settled, that this court will not revise the charge of the court, where there is no statement of the facts proved upon the trial. (Armstrong v. Lipscomb, 11 Texas Rep. 649.) There is no error in the judgment, and it is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lawyers Trust Company v. City of Houston
359 S.W.2d 887 (Texas Supreme Court, 1962)
Day v. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co.
297 S.W. 501 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1927)
Besso v. Southworth
10 S.W. 523 (Texas Supreme Court, 1888)
Lockett v. Schurenberg
60 Tex. 610 (Texas Supreme Court, 1884)
Raleigh & Heidenheimer Bros. v. Cook
60 Tex. 438 (Texas Supreme Court, 1883)
Ross v. McGowen
58 Tex. 603 (Texas Supreme Court, 1883)
Pfeuffer v. Maltby
54 Tex. 454 (Texas Supreme Court, 1881)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
23 Tex. 441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/birge-v-wanhop-tex-1859.