Birdsong v. State

310 So. 2d 410, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14025
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 8, 1975·No. No. 74-1793·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings, we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Birdsong v. State, 310 So. 2d 410, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14025 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

310 So. 2d 410 (Birdsong v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sheffield v. Sheffield
310 So. 2d 410 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)