Birdseye v. Shaeffer
140 U.S. 117, 35 L. Ed. 402, 11 S. Ct. 885, 1891 U.S. LEXIS 2441
This text of 140 U.S. 117 (Birdseye v. Shaeffer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Birdseye v. Shaeffer, 140 U.S. 117, 35 L. Ed. 402, 11 S. Ct. 885, 1891 U.S. LEXIS 2441 (1891).
Opinion
11 S.Ct. 885
35 L.Ed. 402
BIRDSEYE
v.
SHAEFFER et al.
April 27, 1891.
Phil B. Thompson and J. M. Vale, for motion.
Bethel Coopwood and John Hancock, opposed.
FULLER, C. J.
The writ of error is dismissed upon the authority of Gurnee v. County of Patrick, 137 U. S. 141, 11 Sup. Ct. Rep. 34; Railroad Co. v. Thouron, 134 U. S. 45, 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 517. Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Vaughan v. McArthur Bros.
227 F. 364 (Eighth Circuit, 1915)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
140 U.S. 117, 35 L. Ed. 402, 11 S. Ct. 885, 1891 U.S. LEXIS 2441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/birdseye-v-shaeffer-scotus-1891.