Birdseye v. Shaeffer
140 U.S. 117, 35 L. Ed. 402, 11 S. Ct. 885, 1891 U.S. LEXIS 2441
Opinion
11 S.Ct. 885
35 L.Ed. 402
BIRDSEYE
v.
SHAEFFER et al.
April 27, 1891.
Phil B. Thompson and J. M. Vale, for motion.
Bethel Coopwood and John Hancock, opposed.
FULLER, C. J.
The writ of error is dismissed upon the authority of Gurnee v. County of Patrick, 137 U. S. 141, 11 Sup. Ct. Rep. 34; Railroad Co. v. Thouron, 134 U. S. 45, 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 517. Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Birdseye v. Shaeffer, 140 U.S. 117, 35 L. Ed. 402, 11 S. Ct. 885, 1891 U.S. LEXIS 2441 (1891).
140 U.S. 117 (Birdseye v. Shaeffer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Vaughan v. McArthur Bros.
227 F. 364 (Eighth Circuit, 1915)