Birdsall v. Taylor

1 How. Pr. 89
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1845
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 How. Pr. 89 (Birdsall v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Birdsall v. Taylor, 1 How. Pr. 89 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).

Opinion

Nelson, Chief Justice.

The service does not appear to come within the rule.

Decision.—Motion denied with costs, without prejudice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rosenthal v. Maletz
78 N.E.2d 652 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 How. Pr. 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/birdsall-v-taylor-nysupct-1845.