Birdsall v. Plank
243 A.D. 655
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1935
StatusPublished
This text of 243 A.D. 655 (Birdsall v. Plank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Birdsall v. Plank, 243 A.D. 655 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).
Opinion
Appeal from order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint in Ebel action on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Order unanimously affirmed, with ten doEars costs and disbursements. Present — HiE, P. J., McNamee, Crapser, BEss and Heffernan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
243 A.D. 655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/birdsall-v-plank-nyappdiv-1935.