Birdsall v. Plank

243 A.D. 655

Opinion

Appeal from order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint in Ebel action on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Order unanimously affirmed, with ten doEars costs and disbursements. Present — HiE, P. J., McNamee, Crapser, BEss and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Birdsall v. Plank, 243 A.D. 655 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

243 A.D. 655 (Birdsall v. Plank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.