Birdsall v. Pixley

4 Wend. 196
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1830·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Marcy, J.

The rule of last term, allowing an attachment in the alternative, was improvidently ordered. The power of the court to compel discoveries in cases of this kind is limited to nonsuiting a plaintiff, or striking out a plea or notice of special matter of a defendant, or debarring him from any defence in relation to which a discovery is sought; and by an express provision, their power is confined to the remedies mentioned. The motion for the attachment is therefore denied. 2 R. S. 200, § 26.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Birdsall v. Pixley, 4 Wend. 196 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1830).

4 Wend. 196 (Birdsall v. Pixley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. Flagg
44 N.J. Eq. 109 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1888)
Walker v. . Walker
82 N.Y. 260 (New York Court of Appeals, 1880)
United States v. Hutton
26 F. Cas. 454 (S.D. New York, 1879)