Birdsall v. Miller
This text of 24 N.E.3d 1178 (Birdsall v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In Habeas Corpus. This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of petitioner’s requests for findings of faci/conclusions of law. It is ordered by the court that the requests are denied. The habeas petition was dismissed because petitioner was on parole, and parole constitutes detention for purposes of escape under R.C. 2921.34. See State v. Thompson, 102 Ohio St.3d 287, 2004-Ohio-2946, 809 N.E.2d 1134.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 N.E.3d 1178, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/birdsall-v-miller-ohio-2015.