Birdsall v. Miller
24 N.E.3d 1178, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1459
Opinion
In Habeas Corpus. This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of petitioner’s requests for findings of faci/conclusions of law. It is ordered by the court that the requests are denied. The habeas petition was dismissed because petitioner was on parole, and parole constitutes detention for purposes of escape under R.C. 2921.34. See State v. Thompson, 102 Ohio St.3d 287, 2004-Ohio-2946, 809 N.E.2d 1134.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Birdsall v. Miller, 24 N.E.3d 1178, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1459 (Ohio 2015).
24 N.E.3d 1178 (Birdsall v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Thompson
809 N.E.2d 1134 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2004)