Birdsall v. American Sales Book Co.
202 A.D. 733
Opinion
Order modified by granting defendant’s motion so as to strike out paragraph XII of the amended complaint as irrelevant and prejudicial, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. We think this paragraph attempts to state a cause of action for infringement of patent, of which the Federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction. (Continental Store Service Co. v. Clark, 100 N. Y. 365; Comerma Co. v. Comerma, 182 App. Div. 576.) Blackmar, P. J., Rich, Kelly, Jaycox and Young, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Birdsall v. American Sales Book Co., 202 A.D. 733 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1922).
202 A.D. 733 (Birdsall v. American Sales Book Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Continental Store Service Co. v. . Clark
3 N.E. 335 (New York Court of Appeals, 1885)
Comerma Co. v. Comerma & Tile Arch Construction Co.
182 A.D. 576 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1918)