Bird v. United States

Supreme Court

Bird v. United States

316 U.S. 693, 62 S. Ct. 1294

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJune 1, 1942

DocketNo. 1204

StatusPublished

This text of 316 U.S. 693 (Bird v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bird v. United States, 316 U.S. 693, 62 S. Ct. 1294 (1942).

Pincite

Opinion

The petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, and the motion for leave to proceed further in forma pauperis, are denied for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the papers herein submitted, finds that the application for writ of certiorari was not made within the time provided by law. Rule XI of the Criminal Appeals Rules, 292 U. S. 665-666; United [694]*694States ex rel. Coy v. United States, ante, p. 342. The petition for writ of certiorari is therefore also denied.

Frank Bird, pro se. Solicitor General Fahy for the United States.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, and the motion for leave to proceed further in forma pauperis, are denied for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the papers herein submitted, finds that the application for writ of certiorari was not made within the time provided by law. Rule XI of the Criminal Appeals Rules, 292 U. S. 665-666; United [694]*694States ex rel. Coy v. United States, ante, p. 342. The petition for writ of certiorari is therefore also denied.

Frank Bird, pro se. Solicitor General Fahy for the United States.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

316 U.S. 693, 62 S. Ct. 1294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bird-v-united-states-scotus-1942.