Bird v. United States

District Court, D. Montana·Decided June 3, 2025·No. 1:23-cv-00148·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION

KANEISHA BIRD; O.M. (a minor), CV 23-148-BLG-SPW-TJC Plaintiffs, Vs. ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE’S FINDINGS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND RECOMMENDATIONS acting by and through the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Defendant.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Counter-Claimant, vs. KANEISHA BIRD, Counter-Defendant. The United States Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendation on May 16, 2025. (Doc. 42). The Magistrate recommended that the Court grant the United States’ Motion to Dismiss Count Four because Plaintiffs failed “to identify a

source of substantive law that establishes specific fiduciary duties, or allege facts that the government has failed to perform those duties.” (d. at 14).

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), parties are required to file written

objections within 14 days of the filing of the Magistrate’s Findings and

Recommendation. No objections were filed. When neither party objects, this Court

reviews the Magistrate’s Findings and Recommendation for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a “definite and firm conviction that a

mistake has been committed.” United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir.

2000). After reviewing the Findings and Recommendation, this Court does not find that the Magistrate committed clear error. IT IS ORDERED that the proposed Findings and Recommendation (Doc. 42) entered by the United States Magistrate Judge are ADOPTED IN FULL. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: 1. The United States’ Motion to Dismiss Count Four (Doc. 28) is GRANTED; 2. Count Four of the Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED; and 3. The above-captioned case shall remain referred to United States Magistrate Judge Cavan who will conduct all necessary hearings and submit to the undersigned proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of all motions excepted from the Magistrate Judge’s jurisdiction by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). /Tf

DATED this

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bird v. United States, (D. Mont. 2025).

Bird v. United States (Bird v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related