Bird v. State

134 S.W. 687, 61 Tex. Crim. 205, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 57
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 8, 1911
DocketNo. 937.
StatusPublished

This text of 134 S.W. 687 (Bird v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bird v. State, 134 S.W. 687, 61 Tex. Crim. 205, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 57 (Tex. 1911).

Opinion

HARPER, Judge.

—The Assistant Attorney-General moves to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the recognizance is not sufficient to confer jurisdiction upon this court in that the same does not name the court in which appellant was convicted, nor does it state the amount of the punishment imposed by the verdict of the jury, as require^ by article 887 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and decisions of this court construing this article. An inspection of the recognizance shows that it is defective in this respect, wherefore the motion of the Assistant Attorney-General to dismiss is sustained, and the appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 S.W. 687, 61 Tex. Crim. 205, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 57, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bird-v-state-texcrimapp-1911.