Bird v. State
36 Ala. 279
Opinion
The only witness who testified in this case, was, under the decision in the case of Davidson v. The State, (33 Ala. 350,) an accomplice of the defendant, in the game for which he was on trial. The circuit court ruled, that a conviction could be had on the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice, if that witness had been examined on the preliminary inquisition before the grand jury. In this the circuit court erred. — Code, §§3246-7-8.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bird v. State, 36 Ala. 279 (Ala. 1860).
36 Ala. 279 (Bird v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Darden v. State
68 So. 550 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1915)
Hendrix v. State
1913 OK CR 18 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1913)
Moses v. State
58 Ala. 117 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1877)