Bird v. International Railway Co.
171 A.D. 973, 156 N.Y.S. 1116
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 15, 1915
StatusPublished
This text of 171 A.D. 973 (Bird v. International Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bird v. International Railway Co., 171 A.D. 973, 156 N.Y.S. 1116 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).
Opinion
—Judg[974]*974ment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Footé, J., who dissented upon the ground that the court erred in charging the jury that the defendant was called upon to have the car approach the usual stopping place under control.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
171 A.D. 973, 156 N.Y.S. 1116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bird-v-international-railway-co-nyappdiv-1915.