Bird v. Faulkner

23 Jones & S. 529
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedJune 23, 1887
StatusPublished

This text of 23 Jones & S. 529 (Bird v. Faulkner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bird v. Faulkner, 23 Jones & S. 529 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1887).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons assigned by the learned Chief Judge at the time of making the order, and the additional reason that the verdict cannot be held to be against the weight of evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 Jones & S. 529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bird-v-faulkner-nysuperctnyc-1887.