Bird v. Driscoll
This text of 620 F. App'x 205 (Bird v. Driscoll) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Paul Charles Bird appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the bankruptcy court judge and dismissing Bird’s amended complaint filed as an adversary proceeding in the bankruptcy court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bird v. Driscoll, No. l:15-cv01326-GLR (D.Md. May 20, 2015). We deny Bird’s motion for the preparation of a transcript at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
620 F. App'x 205, 542 B.R. 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bird-v-driscoll-ca4-2015.