Bird v. Driscoll

Fourth Circuit

Bird v. Driscoll

620 F. App'x 205, 542 B.R. 205

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 22, 2015·No. No. 15-1668·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Paul Charles Bird appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the bankruptcy court judge and dismissing Bird’s amended complaint filed as an adversary proceeding in the bankruptcy court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bird v. Driscoll, No. l:15-cv01326-GLR (D.Md. May 20, 2015). We deny Bird’s motion for the preparation of a transcript at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Paul Charles Bird appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the bankruptcy court judge and dismissing Bird’s amended complaint filed as an adversary proceeding in the bankruptcy court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bird v. Driscoll, No. l:15-cv01326-GLR (D.Md. May 20, 2015). We deny Bird’s motion for the preparation of a transcript at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Bird v. Driscoll, 620 F. App'x 205, 542 B.R. 205 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

620 F. App'x 205 (Bird v. Driscoll) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.