Bird v. Crown Convenience (In re NWFX, Inc.)
This text of 904 F.2d 469 (Bird v. Crown Convenience (In re NWFX, Inc.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this matter, a panel of this court reversed the judgment of the district court. In re NWFX, Inc., 881 F.2d 530 (8th Cir.1989). The suggestion for rehearing en banc was granted, thus vacating the panel opinion. After rehearing en banc, the judgment of the district court is now affirmed by an equally divided court. Chief Judge Lay and Judges McMillian, Arnold, Wollman, and Magill vote to affirm the district court. Judges Floyd R. Gibson, John R. Gibson, Fagg, Bowman, and Beam would reverse. The clerk of the court, is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
904 F.2d 469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bird-v-crown-convenience-in-re-nwfx-inc-ca8-1990.