Bird v. Burgsteiner

39 S.E. 425, 113 Ga. 1012, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 459
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 20, 1901
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 39 S.E. 425 (Bird v. Burgsteiner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bird v. Burgsteiner, 39 S.E. 425, 113 Ga. 1012, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 459 (Ga. 1901).

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

When in the superior court a case is dismissed for want of prosecution, its reinstatement is a matter within the sound discretion of the court. There was no abuse of discretion in refusing to reinstate the present case.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kinney v. Miller
150 S.E.2d 723 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1966)
Brooks v. Brooks
165 S.E. 106 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)
Shore v. Brown
91 S.E. 909 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Southern Railway Co. v. Empire Printing & Box Co.
47 S.E. 542 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 S.E. 425, 113 Ga. 1012, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bird-v-burgsteiner-ga-1901.