Bird v. Burgsteiner

39 S.E. 425, 113 Ga. 1012, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 459
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 20, 1901·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

When in the superior court a case is dismissed for want of prosecution, its reinstatement is a matter within the sound discretion of the court. There was no abuse of discretion in refusing to reinstate the present case.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bird v. Burgsteiner, 39 S.E. 425, 113 Ga. 1012, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 459 (Ga. 1901).

39 S.E. 425 (Bird v. Burgsteiner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kinney v. Miller
150 S.E.2d 723 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1966)
Brooks v. Brooks
165 S.E. 106 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)
Shore v. Brown
91 S.E. 909 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Southern Railway Co. v. Empire Printing & Box Co.
47 S.E. 542 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)