Bird v. Bird

49 Iowa 693
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided October 10, 1878·Published

Opinion

Day, J.

No motion nor order appears to have been made for trial upon, written evidence, as provided in section 2742 of the Code. The cause can not, therefore, be reviewed de now. Richards et al. v. Hintrager, 45 Iowa, 253; Walker v. Plummer, 41 Iowa, 697; Moses v. The Continental Insurance Company, 40 Iowa, 440. No errors are assigned, and hence no question of law is presented for review. Olson v. Martin, 38 Iowa, 346. This point is distinctly made and urged by the appellee, and we are not at liberty to ignore it. See, also, Vinsant v. Vinsant, 47 Iowa, 594.

Aeeirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bird v. Bird, 49 Iowa 693 (iowa 1878).

49 Iowa 693 (Bird v. Bird) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Olson v. Martin
38 Iowa 346 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1874)
Moses v. Continental Insurance
40 Iowa 440 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1875)
Richards v. Hintrager
45 Iowa 253 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1876)
Vinsant v. Vinsant
47 Iowa 594 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1877)