Bird v. Bird
This text of 49 Iowa 693 (Bird v. Bird) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
No motion nor order appears to have been made for trial upon, written evidence, as provided in section 2742 of the Code. The cause can not, therefore, be reviewed de now. Richards et al. v. Hintrager, 45 Iowa, 253; Walker v. Plummer, 41 Iowa, 697; Moses v. The Continental Insurance Company, 40 Iowa, 440. No errors are assigned, and hence no question of law is presented for review. Olson v. Martin, 38 Iowa, 346. This point is distinctly made and urged by the appellee, and we are not at liberty to ignore it. See, also, Vinsant v. Vinsant, 47 Iowa, 594.
Aeeirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
49 Iowa 693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bird-v-bird-iowa-1878.