Bird Lakes Development Corp. v. Velez

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bird Lakes Development Corp. v. Velez

846 So. 2d 555, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 5419, 2003 WL 1877482

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 16, 2003

DocketNo. 3D02-751

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 846 So. 2d 555 (Bird Lakes Development Corp. v. Velez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bird Lakes Development Corp. v. Velez, 846 So. 2d 555, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 5419, 2003 WL 1877482 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After a careful review of this complex consolidated record, we find that the trial court erred in finding that the crossclaim and third party claim brought by Bird Lakes Development Corporation [Bird Lakes] against Arnaldo Velez, Taylor, Brion, Buker & Greene, Henry H. Taylor, Jr., Gerald Moore, James Moore and Robert Paterno [Velez] did not survive the dismissal entered in Case No. 96-09627CA which was consolidated with the instant action.¹ This is so because none of the various pleadings filed nor the orders entered in connection with the dismissal refer to the claims between Bird Lakes and Velez, but address only the claims between Home Insurance Company and Bird Lakes.

Accordingly, we reverse the order of the trial court and remand for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After a careful review of this complex consolidated record, we find that the trial court erred in finding that the crossclaim and third party claim brought by Bird Lakes Development Corporation [Bird Lakes] against Arnaldo Velez, Taylor, Brion, Buker & Greene, Henry H. Taylor, Jr., Gerald Moore, James Moore and Robert Paterno [Velez] did not survive the dismissal entered in Case No. 96-09627CA which was consolidated with the instant action.¹ This is so because none of the various pleadings filed nor the orders entered in connection with the dismissal refer to the claims between Bird Lakes and Velez, but address only the claims between Home Insurance Company and Bird Lakes.

Accordingly, we reverse the order of the trial court and remand for further proceedings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

846 So. 2d 555, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 5419, 2003 WL 1877482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bird-lakes-development-corp-v-velez-fladistctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack