Bird Lakes Development Corp. v. Meruelo

626 So. 2d 239, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6709
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 22, 1993·No. Nos. 92-59, 92-6 and 91-2646·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because a trial court may not award appellate attorney’s fees absent a mandate from the appellate court, Garcia v. Garcia, 570 So.2d 357 (Fla. 3d DCA1990), we reverse the trial court’s award of appellate attorney’s fees to appellee Gesyl’s attorney. Finding no merit in appellant’s other contentions, we affirm the judgment for attorney’s fees in all other respects.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bird Lakes Development Corp. v. Meruelo, 626 So. 2d 239, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6709 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

626 So. 2d 239 (Bird Lakes Development Corp. v. Meruelo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alvarez, Armas & Borron, P.A. v. Heitman
770 So. 2d 208 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
City of Tampa v. JANKE CONST., INC.
626 So. 2d 239 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)