Bird Lakes Development Corp. v. Meruelo

626 So. 2d 239, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6709
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 22, 1993
DocketNos. 92-59, 92-6 and 91-2646
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 626 So. 2d 239 (Bird Lakes Development Corp. v. Meruelo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bird Lakes Development Corp. v. Meruelo, 626 So. 2d 239, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6709 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because a trial court may not award appellate attorney’s fees absent a mandate from the appellate court, Garcia v. Garcia, 570 So.2d 357 (Fla. 3d DCA1990), we reverse the trial court’s award of appellate attorney’s fees to appellee Gesyl’s attorney. Finding no merit in appellant’s other contentions, we affirm the judgment for attorney’s fees in all other respects.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alvarez, Armas & Borron, P.A. v. Heitman
770 So. 2d 208 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
City of Tampa v. JANKE CONST., INC.
626 So. 2d 239 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
626 So. 2d 239, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bird-lakes-development-corp-v-meruelo-fladistctapp-1993.