Bird Lakes Development Corp. v. Hans

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bird Lakes Development Corp. v. Hans

496 So. 2d 221, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2233, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10227

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 21, 1986·No. No. 86-307·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having carefully considered the record and briefs on appeal, we conclude that the trial court committed no gross abuse of discretion in denying the motion to vacate the default entered against the third-party defendant/appellant. See Bayview Tower Condominium Association, Inc. v. Schweizer, 475 So.2d 982 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Leon Shaffer Golnick Advertising, Inc. v. Cedar, 423 So.2d 1015 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Bay Convalescent Center, Inc. v. Carroll, 352 So.2d 900 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).

[222] Accordingly, the order appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Having carefully considered the record and briefs on appeal, we conclude that the trial court committed no gross abuse of discretion in denying the motion to vacate the default entered against the third-party defendant/appellant. See Bayview Tower Condominium Association, Inc. v. Schweizer, 475 So.2d 982 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Leon Shaffer Golnick Advertising, Inc. v. Cedar, 423 So.2d 1015 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Bay Convalescent Center, Inc. v. Carroll, 352 So.2d 900 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).

[222] Accordingly, the order appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Bird Lakes Development Corp. v. Hans, 496 So. 2d 221, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2233, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10227 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

496 So. 2d 221 (Bird Lakes Development Corp. v. Hans) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related