Birchfield v. State of Tennessee

E.D. Tennessee

Birchfield v. State of Tennessee

DecidedSeptember 13, 2023

Docket3:23-cv-00252

StatusUnknown

This text of Birchfield v. State of Tennessee (Birchfield v. State of Tennessee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Birchfield v. State of Tennessee, (E.D. Tenn. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE

THOMAS C. BIRCHFIELD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. 3:23-cv-252 v. ) ) Judge Atchley ) STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) Magistrate Judge McCook ) Defendant. ) )

ORDER On August 28, 2023, United States Magistrate Judge Jill E. McCook filed a Report and Recommendation [Doc. 5] pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and the Rules of this Court. The Magistrate Judge granted Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [Doc. 1] and recommends that the undersigned dismiss the Complaint [Doc. 2]. Magistrate Judge McCook screened the Complaint pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and found that because Plaintiff has not alleged any injury, he lacks standing to challenge Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-414. [Doc. 5 at 4–5]. Judge McCook further found that the State of Tennessee is immune from Plaintiff’s suit pursuant to the Eleventh Amendment. [Id. at 5]. Plaintiff has not filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation.1 The Court has nonetheless reviewed the Report and Recommendation, as well as the record, and agrees with Magistrate Judge McCook’s well-reasoned conclusions.

1 Magistrate Judge McCook advised that the parties had 14 days in which to object to the Report and Recommendation and that failure to do so would waive any right to appeal. [Doc. 5 at 6 n.4]; see Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 148-51 (1985) (“It does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate judge’s factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings.”). Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge McCook’s findings of fact and conclusions of law as set forth in the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 5]. Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [Doc. 1] is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s Complaint [Doc. 2] is DISMISSED. SO ORDERED.

/s/ Charles E. Atchley , Jr. ___ CHARLES E. ATCHLEY, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE

THOMAS C. BIRCHFIELD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. 3:23-cv-252 v. ) ) Judge Atchley ) STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) Magistrate Judge McCook ) Defendant. ) )

ORDER On August 28, 2023, United States Magistrate Judge Jill E. McCook filed a Report and Recommendation [Doc. 5] pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and the Rules of this Court. The Magistrate Judge granted Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [Doc. 1] and recommends that the undersigned dismiss the Complaint [Doc. 2]. Magistrate Judge McCook screened the Complaint pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and found that because Plaintiff has not alleged any injury, he lacks standing to challenge Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-414. [Doc. 5 at 4–5]. Judge McCook further found that the State of Tennessee is immune from Plaintiff’s suit pursuant to the Eleventh Amendment. [Id. at 5]. Plaintiff has not filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation.1 The Court has nonetheless reviewed the Report and Recommendation, as well as the record, and agrees with Magistrate Judge McCook’s well-reasoned conclusions.

1 Magistrate Judge McCook advised that the parties had 14 days in which to object to the Report and Recommendation and that failure to do so would waive any right to appeal. [Doc. 5 at 6 n.4]; see Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 148-51 (1985) (“It does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate judge’s factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings.”). Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge McCook’s findings of fact and conclusions of law as set forth in the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 5]. Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [Doc. 1] is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s Complaint [Doc. 2] is DISMISSED. SO ORDERED.

/s/ Charles E. Atchley , Jr. ___ CHARLES E. ATCHLEY, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Birchfield v. State of Tennessee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/birchfield-v-state-of-tennessee-tned-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack