Birchard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Birchard v. State

198 So. 3d 657, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 17311, 2015 WL 7282933

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 18, 2015

Docket2D13-5766

StatusPublished

This text of 198 So. 3d 657 (Birchard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Birchard v. State, 198 So. 3d 657, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 17311, 2015 WL 7282933 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to the appellant’s right to file a timely motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 challenging the effectiveness of his trial counsel with respect to the issues raised in this appeal as well as any other matters relating to postconviction relief which the appellant may wish to set forth in such a motion.

CASANUEVA, WALLACE, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

BY ORDER OF THE COURT.

The Appellant’s motion for rehearing filed September 18, 2015, is granted. The per curiam opinion dated September 4, 2015, is withdrawn, and the attached revised opinion is substituted therefor. The

*658 Appellant’s Amended Motion/Request for Issuance of Written Opinion filed September 18, 2015, has been denied. No further motions for rehearing will be entertained in this appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI