Birch v. Loyd

32 N.Y.S. 1139, 91 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 609, 65 N.Y. St. Rep. 869
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 11, 1895
StatusPublished

This text of 32 N.Y.S. 1139 (Birch v. Loyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Birch v. Loyd, 32 N.Y.S. 1139, 91 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 609, 65 N.Y. St. Rep. 869 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Opinion

DYKMAN, J.

There are three appeals in this case,—one from the judgment entered upon the verdict in favor of the defendant after a trial at the circuit, one from the order denying a motion for a new trial upon the minutes of the court, and one from an order denying a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence,—and the appeals are all entirely destitute of merit. Justice has been done, and the judgment and order denying the motion for a new trial on the minutes should be affirmed, with costs, and the order denying the motion for a new trial upon newly-discovered evidence should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, without an opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 N.Y.S. 1139, 91 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 609, 65 N.Y. St. Rep. 869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/birch-v-loyd-nysupct-1895.