Birano v. State
This text of Birano v. State (Birano v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 21-JUN-2017 12:44 PM
SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
ARTHUR BIRANO, Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant,
vs.
STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Respondent-Appellee.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; S.P.P. NO. 09-1-0040; CR. NO. 01-1-1154)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Nakayama, Acting, C.J., McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ. and Circuit Judge Ayabe, in place of Recktenwald, C.J., recused)
Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant’s Application for Writ
of Certiorari filed on May 10, 2017, is hereby accepted and will
be scheduled for oral argument. The parties will be notified by
the appellate clerk regarding scheduling.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 21, 2017.
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
/s/ Bert I. Ayabe
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Birano v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/birano-v-state-haw-2017.