Birano v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Birano v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 143 Haw. 163
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided June 21, 2017·No. SCWC-15-0000841·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 21-JUN-2017 12:44 PM

SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

ARTHUR BIRANO,

Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant,

vs.

STATE OF HAWAI#I,

Respondent/Respondent-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; S.P.P. NO. 09-1-0040; CR. NO. 01-1-1154)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Nakayama, Acting, C.J., McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ. and Circuit Judge Ayabe, in place of Recktenwald, C.J., recused)

Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant’s Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on May 10, 2017, is hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. The parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 21, 2017. /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Bert I. Ayabe

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Birano v. State, (haw 2017).

Birano v. State (Birano v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.