Biondolillo v. Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co.
This text of 241 A.D. 751 (Biondolillo v. Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, in so far as it denies defendant’s motion to vacate items three and four of the notice of examination, reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and motion to that extent granted. Item three does not involve an issue, and item four involves a conclusion of fact. If defendant will admit, by stipulation, that in connection with the repair of the steamship Transportation it had a contract with the United Marine Contracting Corporation to scale or clean the steamship, and also will admit, as stated in its brief, the facts set forth in item two, there will be no basis for the examination, for, with those items admitted, the terms of the contract, if any, between the defendant and the United Marine Contracting Corporation are immaterial. In the event of such stipulation, the order is reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and the motion granted as to all of the items. If defendant does not so stipulate, the order is affirmed, without costs, as to items one and two and the examination as to them will proceed on five days’ notice. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
241 A.D. 751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/biondolillo-v-robins-dry-dock-repair-co-nyappdiv-1934.