Biondo v. Union Insurance Company of Providence

Missouri Court of Appeals

Biondo v. Union Insurance Company of Providence

179 S.W.3d 396, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1826

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 6, 2005

DocketED 86301

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 179 S.W.3d 396 (Biondo v. Union Insurance Company of Providence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Biondo v. Union Insurance Company of Providence, 179 S.W.3d 396, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1826 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

*397 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Charles Biondo (“Biondo”), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Charles County granting summary judgment in favor of Respondent, Union Insurance Company of Providence (“Union Insurance”). Biondo had filed an action against Union Insurance for breach of his insurance policy and sought compensation for damage to the foundation of his home. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*397 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Charles Biondo (“Biondo”), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Charles County granting summary judgment in favor of Respondent, Union Insurance Company of Providence (“Union Insurance”). Biondo had filed an action against Union Insurance for breach of his insurance policy and sought compensation for damage to the foundation of his home. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

179 S.W.3d 396, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/biondo-v-union-insurance-company-of-providence-moctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack