Binzen v. Healey

33 N.E.2d 547, 285 N.Y. 615, 1941 N.Y. LEXIS 1634
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 4, 1941
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 33 N.E.2d 547 (Binzen v. Healey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Binzen v. Healey, 33 N.E.2d 547, 285 N.Y. 615, 1941 N.Y. LEXIS 1634 (N.Y. 1941).

Opinion

Motion dismissed, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements, on the ground that the order does not finally determine the action. (Van Arsdale v. King, 155 N. Y. 325; Potter v. Diamond, 266 N. Y. 635.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reporter Co. v. Tomicki
44 N.Y. 791 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 N.E.2d 547, 285 N.Y. 615, 1941 N.Y. LEXIS 1634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/binzen-v-healey-ny-1941.