Binz v. Helvetia Florida Enterprises, Inc.
379 U.S. 12, 13 L. Ed. 2d 24, 85 S. Ct. 117, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 420
Opinion
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Binz v. Helvetia Florida Enterprises, Inc., 379 U.S. 12, 13 L. Ed. 2d 24, 85 S. Ct. 117, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 420 (1964).
379 U.S. 12 (Binz v. Helvetia Florida Enterprises, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rose Printing Co. v. Haggerty
584 So. 2d 606 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Payden v. United States
605 F. Supp. 839 (S.D. New York, 1985)
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated Jan. 2, 1985
605 F. Supp. 839 (S.D. New York, 1985)
Narus v. Narus
382 So. 2d 144 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Geneva Ann Singleton v. Percy Foreman
435 F.2d 962 (Fifth Circuit, 1970)
Brant v. Scafati
301 F. Supp. 1374 (D. Massachusetts, 1969)
United States v. Leonard Luxenberg, United States of America v. George Zimmerman
374 F.2d 241 (Sixth Circuit, 1967)