Binstok v. State

573 So. 2d 1049, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 818, 1991 WL 11650
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 6, 1991·No. No. 89-3089·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See United States v. Mendenhall, 446 U.S. 544, 100 S.Ct. 1870, 64 L.Ed.2d 497 (1980); Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 93 S.Ct. 2041, 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973); Thomas v. State, 367 So.2d 260 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); and Donovan v. State, 417 So.2d 674 (Fla.1982).

ANSTEAD, DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Binstok v. State, 573 So. 2d 1049, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 818, 1991 WL 11650 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

573 So. 2d 1049 (Binstok v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Glantzis v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co.
573 So. 2d 1049 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)