Binon v. Boel

New York Court of Appeals

Binon v. Boel

74 N.E.2d 466, 297 N.Y. 528, 1947 N.Y. LEXIS 1022

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 2, 1947

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 74 N.E.2d 466 (Binon v. Boel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Binon v. Boel, 74 N.E.2d 466, 297 N.Y. 528, 1947 N.Y. LEXIS 1022 (N.Y. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

*530 On the appeal of the defendant Rosemarie de Paris, Inc., from the order dismissing its counterclaim: Order affirmed, with costs, and questions certified answered in the negative. On the appeal of the defendant Binon Ohococlates, Inc., from the order dismissing its counterclaim: Order affirmed, with costs, and questions certified answered in the negative. On the appeal of the defendant Rosemarie de Paris, Inc., from the order denying the motion to dismiss the third cause of action: Appeal dismissed, with costs, on the ground that the defendant Rosemarie de Paris, Inc., is not a party aggrieved- by the order. On the appeal of the defendant Rene Boel from the order denying the motion to dismiss the third cause of action: Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative. No opinion.

Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacher, Dye and Fuld, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*530 On the appeal of the defendant Rosemarie de Paris, Inc., from the order dismissing its counterclaim: Order affirmed, with costs, and questions certified answered in the negative. On the appeal of the defendant Binon Ohococlates, Inc., from the order dismissing its counterclaim: Order affirmed, with costs, and questions certified answered in the negative. On the appeal of the defendant Rosemarie de Paris, Inc., from the order denying the motion to dismiss the third cause of action: Appeal dismissed, with costs, on the ground that the defendant Rosemarie de Paris, Inc., is not a party aggrieved- by the order. On the appeal of the defendant Rene Boel from the order denying the motion to dismiss the third cause of action: Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative. No opinion.

Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacher, Dye and Fuld, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 N.E.2d 466, 297 N.Y. 528, 1947 N.Y. LEXIS 1022, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/binon-v-boel-ny-1947.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack