Binny v. Carney

46 N.Y.S. 307

This text of 46 N.Y.S. 307 (Binny v. Carney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Binny v. Carney, 46 N.Y.S. 307 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1897).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The request to charge was properly declined. The defendant’s agent was bound to take precautions against danger, not only to persons who he either knew or had reason to believe were approaching the hole, but of those persons "who it was probable, in the ordinary use of the premises, might approach the hole; and such was the charge of the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 N.Y.S. 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/binny-v-carney-nyappdiv-1897.