Binns v. Vitagraph Co. of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Binns v. Vitagraph Co. of America

140 A.D. 925

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1910

StatusPublished

This text of 140 A.D. 925 (Binns v. Vitagraph Co. of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Binns v. Vitagraph Co. of America, 140 A.D. 925 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

Dowling,' J. (dissenting):

I dissent upon the ground that the use of the plaintiff’s name upon the film itself is not a use, within the meaning of the statute,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dowling,' J. (dissenting):

I dissent upon the ground that the use of the plaintiff’s name upon the film itself is not a use, within the meaning of the statute,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

140 A.D. 925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/binns-v-vitagraph-co-of-america-nyappdiv-1910.