Binns v. Adams

54 Kan. 615
Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided January 15, 1895·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The only errors complained of in the petition in error relate to matters on the trial for which a new trial was prayed for. The action of the trial court in overruling the motion for a new trial is not assigned for error; therefore no question is properly raised in this court for our consideration. (Carson v. Funk, 27 Kas. 524; Clark v. Schnur, 40 id. 72; City of McPherson v. Manning, 43 id. 129.) The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Binns v. Adams, 54 Kan. 615 (kan 1895).

54 Kan. 615 (Binns v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bennett v. National Supply Co.
102 P. 511 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1909)
Coffeyville Gas Co. v. Dooley
84 P. 719 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1906)
Perry v. Wheeler
66 P. 1007 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1901)
Beall v. Mutual Life Insurance Co.
1898 OK 75 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1898)