Binns v. Adams

Supreme Court of Kansas

Binns v. Adams

54 Kan. 615

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedJanuary 15, 1895

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 54 Kan. 615 (Binns v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Binns v. Adams, 54 Kan. 615 (kan 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The only errors complained of in the petition in error relate to matters on the trial for which a new trial was prayed for. The action of the trial court in overruling the motion for a new trial is not assigned for error; therefore no question is properly raised in this court for our consideration. (Carson v. Funk, 27 Kas. 524; Clark v. Schnur, 40 id. 72; City of McPherson v. Manning, 43 id. 129.) The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The only errors complained of in the petition in error relate to matters on the trial for which a new trial was prayed for. The action of the trial court in overruling the motion for a new trial is not assigned for error; therefore no question is properly raised in this court for our consideration. (Carson v. Funk, 27 Kas. 524; Clark v. Schnur, 40 id. 72; City of McPherson v. Manning, 43 id. 129.) The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.-

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 Kan. 615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/binns-v-adams-kan-1895.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack