Binnie v. City of New York Department of Correction

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Binnie v. City of New York Department of Correction

236 A.D.2d 264, 654 N.Y.S.2d 297, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1272

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 18, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 236 A.D.2d 264 (Binnie v. City of New York Department of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Binnie v. City of New York Department of Correction, 236 A.D.2d 264, 654 N.Y.S.2d 297, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1272 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Beverly Cohen, J.), entered July 25, 1996, which denied petitioner’s CPLR article 78 petition for annulment of respondents’ determination to dismiss him as a correction officer and dismissed the proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner’s contentions that the delay in conducting the test following his random selection (see, Matter of Seelig v Koehler, 76 NY2d 87, cert denied 498 US 847) violated departmental policy and that his designated supervisor targeted his test day to coincide with his return from vacation are without support in the record. Nor is dismissal from the department for use of marihuana so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to our sense of fairness (Trotta v Ward, 77 NY2d 827). Concur— Wallach, J. P., Rubin, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Beverly Cohen, J.), entered July 25, 1996, which denied petitioner’s CPLR article 78 petition for annulment of respondents’ determination to dismiss him as a correction officer and dismissed the proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner’s contentions that the delay in conducting the test following his random selection (see, Matter of Seelig v Koehler, 76 NY2d 87, cert denied 498 US 847) violated departmental policy and that his designated supervisor targeted his test day to coincide with his return from vacation are without support in the record. Nor is dismissal from the department for use of marihuana so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to our sense of fairness (Trotta v Ward, 77 NY2d 827). Concur— Wallach, J. P., Rubin, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

236 A.D.2d 264, 654 N.Y.S.2d 297, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/binnie-v-city-of-new-york-department-of-correction-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack