Binks Manufacturing Company v. The Spee-Flo Manufacturing Corporation

392 F.2d 585, 157 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 358, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7268
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 18, 1968·No. 24851_1·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The Spee-Flo Manufacturing Company, appellee, charged Sinks Manufacturing Company, appellant, with infringement of Spee-Flo patent number 3,000,576. The District Court found the patent valid and infringed. The opinion of the District Court is published at 264 F.Supp. 542 (1967).

Although most favorably impressed by the brilliant argument of counsel for ap *586 pellant, presented both orally and in briefs, we are nevertheless convinced that the District Judge was right. We see no necessity for duplication of or further comment on the opinion below.

The judgment, therefore, will be affirmed and the case remanded to the District Court for further proceedings.

Affirmed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Binks Manufacturing Company v. The Spee-Flo Manufacturing Corporation, 392 F.2d 585, 157 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 358, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7268 (5th Cir. 1968).

392 F.2d 585 (Binks Manufacturing Company v. The Spee-Flo Manufacturing Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rohm and Haas Co. v. Dawson Chemical Co., Inc.
557 F. Supp. 739 (S.D. Texas, 1983)
Ex-Cell-O Corp. v. Litton Industrial Products, Inc.
479 F. Supp. 671 (E.D. Michigan, 1979)
Antici v. KBH Corp.
324 F. Supp. 236 (N.D. Mississippi, 1971)