Binks Manufacturing Company v. The Spee-Flo Manufacturing Corporation

Fifth Circuit

Binks Manufacturing Company v. The Spee-Flo Manufacturing Corporation

392 F.2d 585, 157 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 358, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7268

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedApril 18, 1968

Docket24851_1

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 392 F.2d 585 (Binks Manufacturing Company v. The Spee-Flo Manufacturing Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Binks Manufacturing Company v. The Spee-Flo Manufacturing Corporation, 392 F.2d 585, 157 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 358, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7268 (5th Cir. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The Spee-Flo Manufacturing Company, appellee, charged Sinks Manufacturing Company, appellant, with infringement of Spee-Flo patent number 3,000,576. The District Court found the patent valid and infringed. The opinion of the District Court is published at 264 F.Supp. 542 (1967).

Although most favorably impressed by the brilliant argument of counsel for ap *586 pellant, presented both orally and in briefs, we are nevertheless convinced that the District Judge was right. We see no necessity for duplication of or further comment on the opinion below.

The judgment, therefore, will be affirmed and the case remanded to the District Court for further proceedings.

Affirmed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI