Binkley v. United States

Sixth Circuit

Binkley v. United States

116 F.2d 277, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 2618

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided December 11, 1940·No. No. 8621·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the record in the above cause, the court is of the opinion that it does not disclose substantial .evidence to sustain the submission of an issue to a jury with respect to the guilt of the defendant, and that the motion for directed verdict, made on behalf of the defendant, should have been granted.

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the record in the above cause, the court is of the opinion that it does not disclose substantial .evidence to sustain the submission of an issue to a jury with respect to the guilt of the defendant, and that the motion for directed verdict, made on behalf of the defendant, should have been granted.

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for new trial.

Binkley v. United States, 116 F.2d 277, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 2618 (6th Cir. 1940).

Pincite

116 F.2d 277 (Binkley v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.