Binkley v. United States

Sixth Circuit

Binkley v. United States

116 F.2d 277, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 2618

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedDecember 11, 1940

DocketNo. 8621

StatusPublished

This text of 116 F.2d 277 (Binkley v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Binkley v. United States, 116 F.2d 277, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 2618 (6th Cir. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the record in the above cause, the court is of the opinion that it does not disclose substantial .evidence to sustain the submission of an issue to a jury with respect to the guilt of the defendant, and that the motion for directed verdict, made on behalf of the defendant, should have been granted.

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the record in the above cause, the court is of the opinion that it does not disclose substantial .evidence to sustain the submission of an issue to a jury with respect to the guilt of the defendant, and that the motion for directed verdict, made on behalf of the defendant, should have been granted.

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for new trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 F.2d 277, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 2618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/binkley-v-united-states-ca6-1940.