Binion v. Dickison

1928 OK 531, 280 P. 801, 138 Okla. 171, 1928 Okla. LEXIS 964
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided September 18, 1928·No. 18724·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

RILEY, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment granting a temporary injunction restraining the enforcement of ordinance No. 2740 of the city of Oklahoma City, which ordinance requires the payment of a fee and securing of a license before one is permitted to engage in the occupation of huckstering in said city.

The opinion in cause No. 18510, this day rendered, In re Habeas Corpus of Lou Dickison, 138 Okla. 266, 280 Pac. 797, is decisive-of the issues here presented. Upon the authority of that opinion, this cause is reversed. The syllabus of that case is adopted as the syllabus of this cause.

The writ is denied.

BRANSON, C. J., and HUNT, CLARK, and HEFNER, JJ., concur. MASON, Y. C. J., and LESTER, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Binion v. Dickison, 1928 OK 531, 280 P. 801, 138 Okla. 171, 1928 Okla. LEXIS 964 (Okla. 1928).

1928 OK 531 (Binion v. Dickison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crawford v. Town of Marshall
1932 OK 517 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1932)