Home/Supreme Court of Florida/Bingham v. Sumner

Bingham v. Sumner

116 So. 270, 95 Fla. 271
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 15, 1928
StatusPublished

This text of 116 So. 270 (Bingham v. Sumner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bingham v. Sumner, 116 So. 270, 95 Fla. 271 (Fla. 1928).

Opinion

Per Curiam.'

The judgment in this case should be reversed upon authority of the controlling opinion filed on rehearing in the case of McCamy v. Payne, opinion filed at this term of the Court, and it is so ordered.

Reversed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Ellis, C. J., and Brown, J., concur in the opinion! Strum, J., not particupating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 So. 270, 95 Fla. 271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bingham-v-sumner-fla-1928.