Bingham v. Pepoon

9 Mass. 239
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1812
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 9 Mass. 239 (Bingham v. Pepoon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bingham v. Pepoon, 9 Mass. 239 (Mass. 1812).

Opinion

Curia.

The judgment in the first suit is a final judgment, although no execution can issue, and of consequence the attachment in the original suit, if there was one, is lost by the review.

It would be absurd to suppose that the legislature intended to impair the rights of the parties. We must, therefore, consider the bond as good, nor does the provision of the statute appear to us unreasonable.

The using of different language in different sections of the statute, seems to have been the effect of accident or inattention, as the two cases supposed afford no ground for a distinction. Let judgment be entered for the plaintiff,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Russia Cement Co. v. Le Page Co.
45 N.E. 763 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 Mass. 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bingham-v-pepoon-mass-1812.