Bingham v. Godfrey

New York Court of Appeals

Bingham v. Godfrey

490 N.E.2d 1228, 67 N.Y.2d 753, 500 N.Y.S.2d 102, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 17139

DecidedFebruary 19, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 490 N.E.2d 1228 (Bingham v. Godfrey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bingham v. Godfrey, 490 N.E.2d 1228, 67 N.Y.2d 753, 500 N.Y.S.2d 102, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 17139 (N.Y. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to dismiss appeals taken by defendants Patricia M. Godfrey, individually and doing business as Empire Commercial Maintenance, and Donald Garsia granted and appeals dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the appeals are untimely.

Motion to dismiss appeal taken by plaintiff Charles C. Bingham granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and $20 costs of motion, upon the ground that an appeal does not lie as of right (CPLR 5601, as amended by L 1985, ch 300).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to dismiss appeals taken by defendants Patricia M. Godfrey, individually and doing business as Empire Commercial Maintenance, and Donald Garsia granted and appeals dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the appeals are untimely.

Motion to dismiss appeal taken by plaintiff Charles C. Bingham granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and $20 costs of motion, upon the ground that an appeal does not lie as of right (CPLR 5601, as amended by L 1985, ch 300).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

490 N.E.2d 1228, 67 N.Y.2d 753, 500 N.Y.S.2d 102, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 17139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bingham-v-godfrey-ny-1986.