Bingaman v. Human Services
This text of Bingaman v. Human Services (Bingaman v. Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT] United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
No. 98-2201
RICHARD BINGAMAN,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES,
Defendant, Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE
[Hon. Morton A. Brody, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Boudin, Circuit Judge, Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge, and Stahl, Circuit Judge.
Richard Bingaman on brief pro se. Andrew Ketterer, Attorney General, Andrew S. Hagler, Assistant Attorney General, and Paul Stern, Deputy Attorney General, on brief for appellee.
September 10, 1999
Per Curiam. Plaintiff-appellant Richard Bingaman appeals pro se from an order denying preliminary injunctive relief. While this appeal was pending, the underlying case was dismissed. Bingaman has not appealed from the dismissal. Under the circumstances, the instant appeal is moot, and we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Caribbean Tubular Corp. v. Fernandez Torrecillas (In re Caribbean Tubular Corp.), 813 F.2d 533, 534 (1st Cir. 1987) (per curiam). Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bingaman v. Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bingaman-v-human-services-ca1-1999.