Bing v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bing v. State

750 So. 2d 703, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 106, 2000 WL 5928

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 7, 2000·No. No. 1D99-616·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Finding no reversible error, we affirm the defendant’s conviction and sentence for robbery with a firearm. As we did in Woods v. State, 740 So.2d 20 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), we certify the following question to the supreme court, as one of great public importance:

DOES THE PRISON RELEASEE REOFFENDER PUNISHMENT ACT, CODIFIED AS SECTION 775.082(8), FLORIDA STATUTES (1997), VIOLATE THE SEPARATION OF POWERS CLAUSE OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION?

JOANOS, WEBSTER and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Finding no reversible error, we affirm the defendant’s conviction and sentence for robbery with a firearm. As we did in Woods v. State, 740 So.2d 20 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), we certify the following question to the supreme court, as one of great public importance:

DOES THE PRISON RELEASEE REOFFENDER PUNISHMENT ACT, CODIFIED AS SECTION 775.082(8), FLORIDA STATUTES (1997), VIOLATE THE SEPARATION OF POWERS CLAUSE OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION?

JOANOS, WEBSTER and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.

Bing v. State, 750 So. 2d 703, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 106, 2000 WL 5928 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

750 So. 2d 703 (Bing v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related