Bing v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bing v. State

721 So. 2d 834, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15933, 1998 WL 880559

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 18, 1998

DocketNo. 98-1911

StatusPublished

This text of 721 So. 2d 834 (Bing v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bing v. State, 721 So. 2d 834, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15933, 1998 WL 880559 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court denied Darren Bing’s motion for postconviction relief. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850. On appeal, Mr. Bing asserts that, prior to entering his plea, his attorney misled him with regard to the possible sentence he could receive. The transcript of the plea colloquy clearly establishes that this is not so. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s ruling.

AFFIRMED.

W. SHARP, PETERSON and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court denied Darren Bing’s motion for postconviction relief. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850. On appeal, Mr. Bing asserts that, prior to entering his plea, his attorney misled him with regard to the possible sentence he could receive. The transcript of the plea colloquy clearly establishes that this is not so. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s ruling.

AFFIRMED.

W. SHARP, PETERSON and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

721 So. 2d 834, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15933, 1998 WL 880559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bing-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.