Bing v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bing v. State

590 So. 2d 561, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13452, 1991 WL 273708

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 27, 1991

DocketNo. 91-411

StatusPublished

This text of 590 So. 2d 561 (Bing v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bing v. State, 590 So. 2d 561, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13452, 1991 WL 273708 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

COBB, Judge.

The appellant, Richard B. Bing, challenges his sentence, which was based on the use of a “multiplier” for legal constraint for multiple counts. Based on the recent Florida Supreme Court opinion Flowers v. State, 586 So.2d 1058 (Fla.1991), we must reverse and remand for a new sentence.

We disagree with the appellant s second contention that the jury verdict in this case lacked the requisite specificity to support the minimum mandatory prison term of eight years required by section 775.087(2), Florida Statutes (1989).

REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR NEW SENTENCE.

COWART and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI