Bing v. Bowers
This text of 26 F.2d 1017 (Bing v. Bowers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Leo S. BING, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
Frank K. BOWERS, Collector of United States Internal Revenue, Defendant in Error.
Leo S. BING, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
Charles W. ANDERSON, Collector of United States Internal Revenue, Defendant in Error.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
M. S. & I. S. Isaacs, of New York City (John W. Davis, Lewis M. Isaacs, and Blount Ralls, all of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff in error.
Charles H. Tuttle, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Nathan R. Margold, Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for defendants in error.
Before MANTON, L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Judgments affirmed, upon the opinion of Mack, J., below. 22 F.(2d) 450.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 F.2d 1017, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bing-v-bowers-ca2-1928.