Bing v. Bowers

26 F.2d 1017
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided June 18, 1928·No. 322, 323·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

26 F.2d 1017 (1928)

Leo S. BING, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
Frank K. BOWERS, Collector of United States Internal Revenue, Defendant in Error.
Leo S. BING, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
Charles W. ANDERSON, Collector of United States Internal Revenue, Defendant in Error.

Nos. 322, 323.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 18, 1928.

M. S. & I. S. Isaacs, of New York City (John W. Davis, Lewis M. Isaacs, and Blount Ralls, all of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff in error.

Charles H. Tuttle, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Nathan R. Margold, Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for defendants in error.

Before MANTON, L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Judgments affirmed, upon the opinion of Mack, J., below. 22 F.(2d) 450.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bing v. Bowers, 26 F.2d 1017 (2d Cir. 1928).

26 F.2d 1017 (Bing v. Bowers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Spalding
97 F.2d 701 (Ninth Circuit, 1938)
Wood v. Commissioner
74 F.2d 78 (Sixth Circuit, 1934)