Binford v. Taylor
This text of 20 Ind. 182 (Binford v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Taylor sued the appellant upon an account, as follows:
“ August 14th, 1857. To 297 bushels of wheat, at 1 dollar per bushel, 297 dollars. Interest on same, 70 dollars.”
The complaint claimed damages in the sum of 870 dollars. Trial by the Court; finding and judgment for the plaintiff for 365 dollars.
The evidence is not set out, nor is any question presented other than this, whether the finding and judgment is not for a greater amount than is warranted by the bill of particulars.
The wheat at the price specified, with the interest from the date of the sale, as set forth in the bill of particulars, up to the time of the trial, will amount to all that was found by the Court, and the evidence not being in the record, we can not [183]*183say that interest was improperly allowed. There is no error in the record.
The judgment is affirmed, with costs and five per cent, damages.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
20 Ind. 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/binford-v-taylor-ind-1863.